Previous
Next
JACK LARSON PHOTOGRAPHY
"The Fallacy of Judging Image Quality Online." There is an excellent rant on Luminous-Landscape about what a mistake it is to judge the quality of our work by what we see on a computer screen. Our assessments should be based upon the print. http://luminous-landscape.com/essays/rant23b.shtml
@Isidro: Gracias.
@masoud: Thank you.
@rem_la: Merci.
@Pavan Kaul: Thank you.
@Xerophytes: Thank you.
@Jose Antonio: Gracias.
@Elena Kotrotsou: Thank you.
@Samin: Thank you.
@Miss Ruthie: Thank you.
@akarui: Thank you.
@Anina: Thank you.
@Manel: Gracias.
@MrsAmber: Thanks, Kate. On Am3, all we have is our computer screens. However, with my own work, it is rare that I don't like the print better.
@xavier cardell: Gracias. No saturation was added. In Lightroom, I added a little Vibrance, some Fill Light to open up the shadows, some Clarity, and I increased the Blacks; that's it. The intensely warm light of the sunrise was responsible for the intensity of the already vivid colors.
@/\/\ ! /\/ /\: Thank you. It was great fun.
@k@: Merci.
@Sarah: Merci.
@Lorraine: Thank you.
@Curly: Thank you.
@Barbara: Thanks, Barb. I especially liked the people looking up.
@Susan: To paraphrase Ansel Adams, what we see on the screen is like a rehearsal; the print is the concert.
@don: Thanks, Don.
@mo.langel: Merci.
@khadi: Thank you.
@Betty: Thank you.
@PATRICK: Merci.
@Michael Rawluk: Thanks.
@Susan: I have an unbelievable number of prints that I will never use.
@Ajay: Thanks, Ajay.
@willow: Thanks. I like that part of the photograph as well.
@Irene: Merci.
@Mr Tambourine: Thank you.
@LauraS: Thanks, Laura.
@MARIANA: Many thanks.
@Anna.C: Merci.
@Marie: Merci.
@Dawn: Thank you.
@philippe: Merci.
@Jean Jacques: Merci.
@marc battault: Merci.
@jeff (aka dogilicious): Thanks, Jeff.
@Dulcie: Thanks, Dulcie.
@Judy: Thanks, Judy.
@B. Thomas: Thanks, Barb.
@Claudia: Thank you.
@Steve Rice: Thanks, Steve.
@Bill Brown: Thanks, Bill.
@Bill Laing: Thanks. I agree. Those people are a major component of the series.